Gates Argues World Governments Now Have a Choice

Bill Gates in his Annual letter believes that the issue confronting the world is mainly about the perception that development aid is wasted whereas in fact it has produced some remarkable results in recent years.


"Right now, just over 1 billion people—about 15 percent of the people in the world—live in extreme poverty. On most days, they worry about whether their family will have enough food to eat. There is irony in this, since most of them live and work on farms. The problem is that their farms, which tend to be just a couple acres in size, don’t produce enough food for a family to live on.
Fifteen percent of the world in extreme poverty actually represents a big improvement. Fifty years ago, about 40 percent of the global population was poor. Then, in the 1960s and 1970s, in what is called the “Green Revolution,” Norman Borlaug and other researchers created new seed varieties for rice, wheat, and maize (corn) that helped many farmers vastly improve their yields. In some places, like East Asia, food intake went up by as much as 50 percent. Globally, the price of wheat dropped by two-thirds. These changes saved countless lives and helped nations develop."

Governments are hesitant about maintaining a 1 percent commitment to foreign aid

"The world faces a clear choice. If we invest relatively modest amounts, many more poor farmers will be able to feed their families. If we don’t, one in seven people will continue living needlessly on the edge of starvation. My annual letter this year is an argument for making the choice to keep on helping extremely poor people build self-sufficiency.
My concern is not only about farming; it applies to all the areas of global development and global health in which we work. Using the latest tools—seeds, vaccines, AIDS drugs, and contraceptives, for example—we have made impressive progress. However, if we don’t make these success stories widely known, we won’t generate the funding commitments needed to maintain progress and save lives. At stake are the future prospects of one billion human beings."

It comes down to educating the people in each country and whose business is it to help move that forward. But there is also a Spanish prisoner problem here--that it is in everyone's interest for countries to act in unison to fight deprivation and hunger but it is no country's single interest.  How do we get out of that connundrum  I wonder? Who is fighting for the common good of the world? Or for the world's poorest?